Ḥakirah
Vol. 35 has been mailed to
all subscribers. It is also available from
Amazon. Read now
Shmuel Lesher, “Pour out your wrath
or your love?” and
Zvi Ron, “The Origin and
Development of Schlissel Ḥallah”
The tragic beginning to
5784 came even earlier for the Ḥakirah
community with the sudden petirah on motzaei Yom Kippur
of Rabbi Dr. Sender Epstein, z”l, one of the founding members
of our journal. His contributions to our effort were manifold and
his loss is deeply felt both on a personal and professional level.
This volume is dedicated to his memory and contains several tributes
from leaders of organizations of which he was an essential part. We
also include his first essay originally published in
Ḥakirah
vol. 1, “Truth: Elusive or Illusive? An Historical Example,” where
he demonstrates how the knowledge of history can help decipher a
passage in the Talmud. His approach is emblematic of what
Ḥakirah
has come to represent. Also included is an essay from a Rosh
Yeshivah with whom he was especially close, recounting his final
conversation with Reb Sender, bemoaning the loss of “truth” in
present-day society.
The
Simḥat
Torah massacre and its aftermath
have made clear to our community that the Jewish people stand alone
in a world that has not changed much since the Holocaust. Our
opening essay, “Halakhic Man in Gaza,” looks to the road ahead. The
nation of Israel and the people of Israel must be unified and strong
not only to survive but to lead us to
yemot ha-Mashiaḥ.
It is the blossoming of Rav Joseph Dov Soloveitchik’s vision of the
Jew who combines mankind’s desire to dominate nature with the man
who wishes to know G-d that will unify the divided factions in
Israel and lead eventually to the enlightenment of the entire world.
In the other essay in the Jewish Thought section, titled
“Same-Sex Attraction and the Responsibility of the Community,” the
author refutes an essay by a prominent Modern Orthodox leader that
calls for “welcoming” into our community those who openly flaunt
their rejection of one of the seven Noachide laws. The author of the
Ḥakirah
essay notes that the present revelations about the moral compass of
today’s “intellectuals” show us that we must do nothing to
accommodate their sense of morality.
In honor of Reb Sender,
who was a professor of Applied Mathematics, this edition has a major
focus on Torah and science, especially on
kiddush ha-ḥodesh,
on which he frequently wrote.
In a special section
devoted to the Hebrew Calendar, the essay titled
“History of the Jewish Calendar During the Talmudic Period” claims
that even in the early years, when the new month was determined by
visual sighting, there was gradual movement towards using
calculations in setting the calendar. The second article in the
section, “The Enduring Usefulness of the Tur’s 247-Year
Calendar Cycle,” shows that though this table is flawed, it
nevertheless gives insight into the lunar/solar difference and
points the way to perfecting our present calendar. In our Torah
and Science section, “Jewish Perspectives on Artificial
Intelligence and Synthetic Biology” covers a wide range of issues
with which halakhah will soon be dealing, such as creating
human-like life and programming moral driverless cars. In a
completely different type of article, “Ramban’s Anatomic Description
of the Visual Pathway for the Placement of Tefillin of the Head,” a
psychiatrist makes the startling claim that Ramban “used his
knowledge of the visual pathway in the brain in his explanation of
the word totafot.” In our Halakhah section as well, we
deal with an issue raised by modern science and technology in the
article titled “The Use of Hearing Aids on Shabbos and Yom Tov:
Issues Relating to Changing Batteries and Recharging.”
Our Talmud Torah
section deals primarily with issues of methodology in studying the
primary texts of Ḥazal.
“Talmud Oversimplified? A Partial Review of
Talmud Reclaimed: An Ancient Text in the Modern Era”
demonstrates, contrary to the claim of many, that the
methodologies of talmudic analysis of Rambam and the Ba‘alei
Tosafot were, in fact, not far apart. Similarly, “Targum D-Rabbanan:
On the Commentators’ Onkelos” argues that, unlike the position taken
in modern scholarship, the evidence suggests that Onkelos’
translation was firmly rooted in rabbinic tradition. “Understanding
Unicorns in Talmudic Literature Through the Lens of the Night Sky”
posits that Ḥazal’s
knowledge of astronomy that was so vital in establishing the
calendar was used by them in expressing ideas as well. The
concluding article in this section “Geulah—Calculating the Ketz”
deals with a subject that has been on the minds of many due to
recent events. The author uses the calculation endorsed by the Vilna
Gaon which predicted the year of the reestablishment of the Jewish
state to also predict an imminent geulah.
In
the section titled History of the Sefer, two very different
works with different fates are discussed. “Yalkut Re’uveni:
Abraham Reuben ben Hoeshke’s Popular Kabbalistic Midrashic
Collection” describes the history of this popular work first
published in 1660 that was an “extensive and comprehensive anthology
of kabbalistic and aggadic sayings, organized alphabetically.” In
contrast, “Dr. Philip Birnbaum’s Forgotten Ḥumash”
explains why the man who produced classic works on prayer produced a
commentary on Ḥumash
that had no impact and was quickly forgotten.
In our Minhag
section, both articles deal with Pesaḥ
and show how minhagim change. “Pour Out Your
Wrath or Your Love? Establishing the Authentic Text and Message of
the Haggadah”
explores the meaning of one of the highlights of the
seder and shows how it
came to mean different things in different communities. In “The
Origin and Development of Schlissel Ḥallah,”
the author claims that the original ḥassidic
custom has been distorted over the years, and that the original
intent was unrelated to parnassah.
In our Hebrew section,
the lead article returns us to Gaza. An IDF officer discusses the
halakhah of saying a berakhah in the place where one
experienced a miracle and applies it to the many miracles occurring
in the present war. The two other articles deal with studying
Sefer Bereishit. “Ha-Im Rashi Melamed Dikduk” studies a
passage from Yaakov’s preparation to meet Esav to better understand
Rashi’s methodology. The other article deals with Yitzḥak’s
wells giving insight into the language of the Torah.
As we opened
with mention of our personal loss, we close with the mention of
another loss that followed soon after. On
Tu b-Shvat
Reb Shmuel Reiser,
Ḥakirah’s
lawyer, was
niftar.
He
worked for us pro bono as he did for many others. He was a member of
the Shabbos
ḥavurah
that gave birth to
Ḥakirah
and was involved in reviewing many of the articles, although he was
never given credit. We include his bio at the end of Reb Sender’s
tribute. They were close in life and leave behind a joint legacy of
accomplishment for
klal Yisrael.
Despite the present struggles and the dark clouds on the horizon, we
are well aware that many of our youth are already following in the
footsteps of these role models. We are confident that the younger
generation will triumph over our external enemies and resolve our
internal differences, and so are hopeful that this will lead us soon
to the fulfillment of Rav Soloveichick’s vision and
yemot ha-Mashiaḥ. |